yes, the xl pipeline is necessary, say the republicans, for one of the following reasons (multiple choice):
1. to relieve american gasoline consumers from the super high gas prices we now face;
2. to produce thousands and thousands of permanent infrastructure jobs;
3. to re-pay the billionaire oilmen who would profit for their campaign contributions.
4. to prove that global warming from carbon-based sources is just a fiction created by environmentalists.
if you answered "all of the above", turn off fox news and talk radio.posted @ Wednesday, January 14, 2015 - 14:28
once again, the problem is ignorance by a large group of people who hear only what their chosen "echo chamber" produces.
the koran, and muhammad in particular, do not teach violence. apostasy (and retribution for it) are products of people (so-called leaders) who apparently sought to control large groups of people for their own reasons.
what we need is more muslim leaders today teaching and explaining what the actual teachings of muhammad are. if any religion (or political party) is so afraid of satire that it tries to ban it, that religion or political party is admittedly very very weak to begin with.posted @ Wednesday, January 14, 2015 - 14:19
we will see, won't we.
the repubs' high-pitched anger and hate machine, fueled by their echo chamber, is not well suited to actually governing. i see lots of internal disputes and wheel spinning. hopefully obama is set to wield the veto pen when necessary.
ignorance can be very damaging--good thing they didn't control the economy in 2008 . . . ooops!posted @ Tuesday, January 6, 2015 - 17:49
good grief! more ignorance from augusta. i suppose our "augusta friends" support the republican party taking on the mantle of the "pro-torture" party--despite the fact that torture violates u.s. and international law, among other things.
ronald reagan and dwight eishenhower must be howling in their graves.posted @ Thursday, December 18, 2014 - 14:32
i agree with your selections of "ida" and "dawn of the planet of the apes." "birdman" is right on the edge of the top ten for me. i've only seen one other of your top ten--"under the skin"--and don't agree with your admiration for it.
on the other hand, there are quite a few other films, several now playing, that deserve to be in a "top ten", i think.posted @ Thursday, December 18, 2014 - 14:26
the premise of this article--that bobo has been treated "unfairly" because of his loyalty--would apply to the majority of employees, including faculty members, who stay at one job rather than move around for more pay.
bobo is a decent coach. i hope he finds the right head coaching job. but i don't support paying him more. the other assistant coaches the article mentions are simply paid too much money.posted @ Thursday, December 18, 2014 - 14:17
this is supposed to be funny? i guess to the torture party . . .posted @ Tuesday, December 16, 2014 - 14:55
green is going to do very well at tech. he may torch uga. this is another case of coaches failing to use talented players correctly.posted @ Wednesday, December 10, 2014 - 00:40
green is going to be a star running back somewhere else. i thought he was very good last year, but he was "too small" (and quick) to fit the georgia stereotype. but he was tough.
one of georgia's problems has been its coaches' occasional inability to properly identify and use the truly talented--often because they don't "fit" within uga's pre-determined ideas of what kind of offense they want to run.
as an example, what do alabama, florida state, miss. state, and oregon have in common? answer: each team has a quarterback who can run and pass, who is a complete athlete. i'd wager that none of those four quarterbacks would get a starting opportunity at georgia.
i'd really like to see qb faton bauta get an opportunity to play qb. he fits the mold of the qb's at those (previous) top four schools.posted @ Wednesday, December 3, 2014 - 12:02
richt is correct. squibb kicking to an opponent within a field goal is a cardinal sin. the question is: why the call? fear? lack of trust? panic? i wonder if any other coach suggested a time out when they heard the call for the squibb kick.
but i agree that there were so many great plays and so much tremendous effort by the players that it's better to focus on the positive and hope for a decent bowl in a warm location. and learn for the future.posted @ Sunday, November 30, 2014 - 00:38
i give uga players all the credit in the world for playing hard to keep the game so close in the second half (note the ga. tech advantage in yardage and time of possession).
the last second fourth down pass by mason to give uga the game (er, the lead) was executed perfectly (and the play call on fourth down, moving the pocket and flooding the zone to the right was a great call--raising the question why the play wasn't called more often, especially during overtime); and the blocked extra point by drew that could have won the game demonstrated maximum effort. drew played great!
of course, ultimately, this was, unfortunately, a "coaches" game. the squib kick to a team within a field goal of tying was a cardinal "sin", far worse than the failure to "down" the ball in the alabama game, which fans will never forget. i found myself shouting "don't pooch the kick" seconds before the georgia kicker did just that--just like i remember shouting "down the ball" against alabama, to allow for a few more plays.
oh well--there will be a decent bowl game--hopefully in florida, and the team played well most of the time and had an above average season. the pain from today will wear away. no player has anything to be ashamed of. there will be calls, as there frequently are, in many cases, to modify the predictable, throwback offensive scheme, and to recruit more top defenders. so it goes.posted @ Sunday, November 30, 2014 - 00:33
congratulations to prof. rutledge and the law school. i've heard great things about him!
all four finalists for the job were well qualified. i congratulate pres. morehead for this "next step" in his re-building task.posted @ Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 14:34
there is no way uga can stop auburn's rushing attack. period.
but, by taking a few risks, the uga defense can create some "big plays"--takeaways, etc., to balance the relentless auburn offense.
more important, the uga offense can help the defense by attempting much more of a "ball control" game than bobo or richt seem to like: use multiple backs, including gurley/chubb/michel in the backfield together even, in more creative rushing plays, and more short/high percentage completion passes to the backs.
if the uga offense doesn't control the ball more, auburn will score in the 40's, at least. of course, uga could, as well.posted @ Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 14:30
voters want to repeal "obamacare", not the affordable care act.
he survey instead should ask specific questions about health care coverage incorporated into "obamacare". political ads have succeeded in making people angry about obama and "obamacare", even though many don't don't what the benefits and components are. maybe the press should call it "federal romneycare", or "republican heritage foundation policy health care".posted @ Monday, November 10, 2014 - 15:17
@Athens Trojan: absolutely right! a two back set would help uga with ball control (instead of quick strikes)--that would in turn help the defense. without uga controlling possession somewhat, we could see a total score in the 80's.
i'm sure uga has creative, decent rushing plays in its playbook. somewhere. i just doubt bobo has looked at them. i'd even use a third back at a wingback position on occasion, to facilitate short high percentage passes to backsposted @ Monday, November 10, 2014 - 15:11
i hope judge baxter is not a uga law school graduate.posted @ Monday, November 10, 2014 - 15:04
come on--why the disconnect between popular perception of the economy and other issues (including health care), on one hand, and hard "evidence", on the other? people have been punked.
political ads (for quite some time), talk radio, obstructionist behavior, and tv journalists have pursued a "strategy" of promoting an atmosphere of fear, anger and ignorance. it's worked, in the same way commercial advertisers who pump money into advertising sell more soap, etc.
especially affected have been older (over age 45) white people, who tend to vote in higher percentages.
will this change? we'll see. if a repub wins the white house in 2016, the punking will disappear, regardless of the economy. but, on the other hand, if the percentage of voters in 2016 who are not older white people increases, it's unlikely a repub will become pres.posted @ Friday, November 7, 2014 - 14:49
gurley "took more than $3000" for his signature? no, he was paid that amount in an open transaction--just like coach richt is paid to promote ford trucks in tv ads, and just as uga is paid a licensing fee for selling uga (and uga player) merchandise.
i don't think much of the ncaa. never have, ever since i helped successfully sue the organization for federal antitrust violations. if they have a "rule" on the books, they should make every effort to investigate and enforce it--based upon strong circumstantial evidence of other player violations. obviously they don't.
but what about uga administrators? their primary role has not been to help players; it has been c.y.a. uga, like all colleges, is a member of the ncaa and in combination with other colleges is responsible for the rule in question. it was uga that suspended gurley in the first instance, rather than challenging the rule.
sooner or later, as the amount of money involved in college athletics grows, and salaries paid to coaches grow, the "rules" protecting "amateurism" will look more and more hypocritical (and anti-competitive). look at how uga fights to protect its trademark (and the use of its players' names, etc.). for money.
i think it's time for the government to step in and file another lawsuit against the ncaa (and implicitly its members, who are part of the combination).posted @ Friday, October 31, 2014 - 11:43
i missed the story regarding gurley's suspension by the ncaa. i thought it was uga that suspended him (presumably based upon ncaa's rules--in which uga is a participant).
the big question many people have: are the ncaa's rules prohibiting athletes from receiving compensation for their signatures in violation of federal law (antitrust law, among other things)?
as long as coaches can sell products (coach richt promoting ford on tv ads, for example), ncaa institutional members can profit from selling jerseys and player likenesses, and all students can be compensated for their ideas, likenesses, etc., this question is not just one of "right and wrong", but also one of legality.
of course, assuming that it still is uga which is suspending gurley, any litigation to clarify the matter would name uga, along with the ncaa, as a defendant. the publicity of a trial would at least disclose information that until now has been kept confidential.
without transparency, few people really trust the ncaa--and therefore their institutional members. too much money is involved today.posted @ Wednesday, October 29, 2014 - 13:19
jere has taken his time doing a fairly broad "house cleaning", but i hope his tenure really will be different from his predecessor's. so far, so good.
i'm especially curious to see who he picks as the new dean of the law school.
uga needs to move away from "top down, circle the wagons, c.y.a. no questions asked 'leadership'". administrators who engage in cover-ups and other forms of damaging behavior should be fired quickly, especially when they target students or faculty with whom they disagree.posted @ Tuesday, October 28, 2014 - 12:24
i think (and hope) uga will win by about three points. florida is proud and angry and will be playing hard to save their coach's job. this will not be a blowout. florida has very good athletes.posted @ Tuesday, October 28, 2014 - 12:18
why won't the CHAMBER OF COMMERCE support david perdue for georgia senator? because, as they say, they pursue the interests of their business members, who can't support a candidate who walked out on them, "crying like a little baby".
if not even georgia businessmen will support david perdue, why should anyone?posted @ Saturday, October 25, 2014 - 12:40
snarkydude, what utter nonsense. republicans, with perdue's support, shut down the government rather than seek compromise.
they oppose REPUBLICAN POLICIES when obama proposes them (like obamacare). perdue is from the ted cruz corner of extremist politics.
perdue is PROUD of exporting jobs overseas if it helps him make an extra buck.
perdue supports economic policies that have made georgia's unemployment rate THE WORST IN THE COUNTRY.
obama's worst "sin" has been continuing to compromise with republicans, even while their only objective was to prevent obama from winning re-election--and their strategy was to damage the economy.
non-millionaires who vote republican have been blinded by echo chamber propaganda.posted @ Saturday, October 25, 2014 - 12:35
jim, did you read this "editorial" carefully? especially the last sentence? ("it's time we as citizens decided whether this government, indeed, has our consent--and act accordingly.")?
what wing-nut extremist at your sister paper wrote this? and why in the world did you publish it? please ask that person to explain what he/she means by "act accordingly"? is this a call for sedition? or a call for readers to become better educated by changing information sources?
i guess the point is that right wing media talk to their "constituents" and themselves, plying them with utter nonsense, and then note that many readers/listeners believe that nonsense. what, exactly, have the people not consented to? the worse unemployment rate in the coutry? a failure to provide adequate medical care by expanding medicaid? giving greater tax breaks to our wealthiest "job creators"?
please don't lower abh standards to the augusta level, even if your owners reside there.posted @ Friday, October 24, 2014 - 16:19
"deal's tax and jobs platform" is a stronger pull for those over 65.
jobs? georgia again has the nation's worst unemployment rate. tax? georgia's tax gifts to millionaire and billionaire "job creators" means average taxpayers pay more, or necessary public spending to pull us out of a jobless recovery can't happen.
do "those over 65" read the news? i'm over 65, and the recent article in flagpole magazine detailing deal's "ethics problems" (what an understatement) should be mandatory reading for all voters. even if deal is "on your team," do you really want to support someone who behaves like deal has behaved while in public office?
what a lesson to your children and grandchildren: see, i voted for this person because . . . despite . . .posted @ Thursday, October 23, 2014 - 16:45
Summary: I'm not saying it's lonely to be a movie critic, but we often find ourselves seated alone in an empty theatre when we're watching new stuff. I know people who say they won't go see anything unless they have at least one other person to go with, but I've always enjoyed having the place to myself. I'm not saying it's lonely to be a movie critic, but we often find ourselves seated alone in an empty theatre when we're watching new stuff. I know people who say they won't go see anything unless they have at least one other person to go with, but I've always enjoyed having the place to myself. read more
As you might imagine, the vast majority of the editorial cartoons available these days for publication through the syndicate which supplies cartoons to the Athens Banner-Herald/OnlineAthens are addressing the situation in Ferguson, Mo., where the fatal shooting of a black teen by a white police officer has touched off a number of demonstrations -- some peaceful, but many not at all peaceful, with tear gas fired by police officers and gunshots fired by some protester. read more