Stop allowing yourselves to be brain-washed.
If people only realized that as conscious beings we have the ability to heal ourselves.
Everyone has been duped into believing that it is outside of their own power to heal themselves.
The medical community is a farce and to believe that the government is going to save you is foolish.
Through the use of healthy food, pure water, vigorous exercise and peaceful rest the body is capable of healing it self.
Vibration and meditation are also useful in self healing.
Those who lack the desire to heal themselves will only be returned to the akasha field, until a time when they can except their own true abilities.
Health care is within each of us, some have been taught to believe otherwise by a corrupt system.
Heal yourself, if you cannot, then that is what is meant to be.
Tired of the unconstitutional war on drugs, this is how we the people fight back!
Jury nullification is your right, it’s a citizens right to fight back against the corrupt justice system.
Stop corrupt judges
Stop corrupt prosecutors.
Ask your attorney about it
Demand your public defender use it.
Jury Nullification.....Google it, its YOUR Right
THE WRATH OF THE AWAKENED SAXON by Rudyard Kipling
It was not part of their blood,
It came to them very late, With long arrears to make good,
When the Saxon began to hate.
They were not easily moved,
They were icy -- willing to wait Till every count should be proved,
Ere the Saxon began to hate.
Their voices were even and low.
Their eyes were level and straight.
There was neither sign nor show When the Saxon began to hate.
It was not preached to the crowd.
It was not taught by the state.
No man spoke it aloud When the Saxon began to hate.
It was not suddently bred.
It will not swiftly abate.
Through the chilled years ahead,
When Time shall count from the date That the Saxon began to hate.
I do agree, I have been watching closely these few years and do suspect that is the intention of #44.
But you must ask yourself one simple question;
Do FREE men live under marshal law?
For me the answer is obvious; Hell No!
I wonder if the black community is prepared for the blow-back that is headed their way.
Since the mainstream media is so intent on starting
a race war, maybe they should be among the first casualties.
Has the world forgotten what happens when the Angels and the Saxons and the Celts and the Germans and Slavs and the Rus become angered by events.
Be aware and beware.posted @ Friday, August 23, 2013 - 12:32
Don't let them in, It is every citizen’s duty to resist false arrest
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on numerous occasions that resisting a false arrest is not merely a citizen’s right, but his duty! In fact, the Supreme Court has gone so far as to rule that if a law enforcement officer is killed as a result of actions stemming from a citizen’s attempts to defend themselves against a false arrest, it is the fault of the officer, not the citizen.
Here’s a short collection of relevant court rulings on false arrest and resisting arrest:
“When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant is killed, he is justified.” Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80; Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1.
“These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence.” Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.
“An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery.” (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).
“Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense.” (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).
Do individuals have the right to come to the aid of another citizens being falsely arrested? You bet they do. As another court case ruled:
“One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance.” (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).
And on the issue of actually killing an arresting officer in self defense:
“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer’s life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529.
Resist the police stateposted @ Tuesday, August 13, 2013 - 09:41
Time to stop with the illegal war on drugs.
North Georgia drug task force is a waste of taxpayer money.
If the drug war is so successful why can't they keep drugs out of prison?posted @ Wednesday, August 7, 2013 - 15:49
You should not be the one to point fingers, You are as racist and dishonest as the mainstream media.
You have the right to your opinion, but not your own facts.
Quit making stuff up.
Ivory Tower Liberals
Hope you are prepared for the riots that you folks wanted.
Its gonna get rough.
Are you prepped and ready?
-Beware and be aware.posted @ Friday, July 19, 2013 - 20:48
Bash mobs going at it out in Cali.
Hope all you ivory tower liberals are prepared for the riots.
Things are gonna get rough...can you handle it?
-Beware and be aware.posted @ Friday, July 19, 2013 - 20:43
Wow what a sad bunch of comments.
As the rest of the world awakens to their corrupt and criminal governments, you idiots are embracing those who seek to imprison and enslave you.
The police state is upon us, time to fight back, destroy these roadside readers, destroy the RFI chips in your tags.
Live freeposted @ Thursday, July 18, 2013 - 08:46
I support Ms. Deen because I don't fall for the liberal agenda of the promotion of "white-guilt.
No human being can tell me which words of the English language I am or am not permitted to use.
Liberal progressives are such hypocrites,
Why haven't these folks been dragged out and burned at the stake.
[quote][b]OrneryConservative[/b] - Our society is swirling around and around like a toilet that's already been flushed, just waiting to go down.
If you wish to place blame for societies ills. Start with the Abrahamic religions.
They have been in charge for centuries now, so the blame belongs with those intolerant desert religions.
200 years ago these folks would be burnt to death by the religions of peace.
PETITION URGENTLY REQUESTING THAT CONGRESS LAUNCH AN INDEPENDENT AND COMPREHENSIVE INVESTIGATION INTO UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES ON THE PART OF PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
To: All members of the U.S. Congress:
Whereas, top constitutional attorneys from across the political spectrum now agree that Barack Obama has committed certain specific offenses that unquestionably rise to the level of impeachable “high crimes and misdemeanors”;
Whereas, one of these offenses – that of illegally conducting war against Libya – has been deemed by a bipartisan panel of constitutional experts to be “clearly an impeachable offense” and “gross usurpation of the war power”;
Whereas, Obama’s policy of targeted assassinations of U.S. citizens without any constitutionally required due process – including the drone assassination of an American-born 16-year-old as he was eating dinner – is unanimously deemed by experts, both liberal and conservative, as “an impeachable offense”;
Whereas, Obama’s Justice Department has presided over the disastrous “Fast and Furious” operation in which approximately 2,000 firearms were directed from U.S. gun shops across the U.S.-Mexico border and into the hands of members of Mexican drug cartels, resulting in the deaths of as many as 100 people, including U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry – a scandal that constitutional experts agree constitutes, at a minimum, clear grounds for impeaching Attorney General Eric Holder;
Whereas, Obama has – in clear-cut violation of his oath to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed” imposed by Article II of the Constitution – refused to defend the Defense of Marriage Act, which was passed into law in 1996 under President Bill Clinton;
Whereas, Obama usurped the authority of Congress by issuing an executive order in June 2012 declaring that illegal immigrants who were brought to the U.S. before they turned 16 and who are younger than 30 would not be deported – essentially duplicating the DREAM Act which failed to pass in Congress;
Whereas, Obama made several recess appointments in January 2012 while the Senate was still officially in session, actions the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit recently ruled violated the Constitution because they weren’t made when the Senate was in recess;
Whereas, Whereas, the Obama administration’s multi-faceted scandal in Benghazi, Libya, which resulted in the murder of the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans, is not only proof of what legal experts call tremendous “deceit” on the part of Obama and his top team, but a serious constitutional violation as well;
Whereas, Whereas, numerous other constitutional outrages characterize Obama's presidency – from his administration’s abuses of citizens’ civil rights under cover of the PATRIOT Act; to the Obama Justice Department’s refusal to prosecute the worst case of voter intimidation in modern times, perpetrated by club-wielding New Black Panthers; to Obama’s appointment of more than 30 unelected “czars” to positions in federal agencies when the Constitution requires such appointments be vetted by Congress; and other instances of clear contempt for Congress, the Constitution and the American people:
SIGN THE PETITION
Therefore, Therefore, we the undersigned urge Congress to immediately undertake a full and impartial investigation into the many blatantly unconstitutional actions of Barack Obama, with particular focus on the illegal war against Libya and the illegal “kill list” of U.S. citizens – offenses universally condemned by top constitutional experts as both unprecedented and unquestionably impeachable. For members of Congress, who have also sworn solemn oaths to uphold the Constitution, to allow a president to routinely flout the Supreme Law of the Land without being held accountable is equally repugnant to a free country and a free people.
SIGN THE PETITION URGING CONGRESS TO IMPEACH PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMAposted @ Tuesday, May 14, 2013 - 09:03
@ElevatorLady: First of all "Pit Bull" is NOT a official breed, it is a generic term used to describe dog breeds.
More children are killed every year by doctors and big pharma than by "bull dogs". So save your selected anger for the idiot in the whitehouse and quit blamming a dog for the failures of the owner.
More willing goons goose stepping in the continued escalation of the tyrannical police state.
I wonder how many weeks of training was spent on respecting the rights of the citizens they serve. Do they swear an oath to uphold the constitution or do they swear an oath to the state and the brotherhood.
From what I have witnessed in the past; these folks have spent the last eleven weeks being stripped of their humanities, reinforced by a "us vs. them" mentality. A dominate and intimidate attitude towards their communities all while using military tactics against an unsuspecting population.
Throw in a couple of days of dog shooting and you have created the perfect jack-booted thug, mindless, souless, and violent.
Welcome to the Police State.
"People are attacked by other breeds of dog all the time. The media focuses on the pit bull attacks only"
Yep, in the 70s it was Dobermans, In the 80s it was German Shepards, In the 90s it was Rottweilers, the 2000s brought us the "Pit Bull Attack".
When another breed "attacks" it a dog bite.
With a Bull Dog it is always reported as a "attack".
I own a beautiful 70lb Staffordshire Terrier, highly intelligent, loyal and very hard working. Only type of dog I would ever own.
But..If he were to become aggressive and bite me or anyone else, he would be killed. No question
another victim of the illegal and unconstitutional drug war.
After 50+ years of failure, why do we tolerate such a waste of human life and tax-payers money? Education and treatment better serve the community.
Legislate and violate and incarcerate do not work.
When dealing with Law Enforcement:
Remember; Do not consent to searches.
Do not engage in conversation with LEOs
Know your rights
and Flex your Rights
-Othinnposted @ Friday, January 25, 2013 - 12:04
[quote][b]Ben Had[/b] - Because I'm not stupid[/quote]
That point is a matter of perspective.
[quote][b]Ben Had[/b] - I'm not going to make it easy for someone to still my possessions.[/quote]
So you are paranoid then, or do you speak from experience (history).
so its OK for you to protect your junk with a method of your own choosing.
What right do you have to tell anyone how they may choose to protect their loved ones and possesions.
[quote][b]Ben Had[/b] - I don't live in fear.[/quote]
You sure do, you fear your neighbors who are gun owners.
Fact is your a hypocriet, the worse kind, because you fear the truth.
Be aware and Beware.
Here is a question for BenHad and the other liberals on this forum.
Do you lock your doors at night?, do lock your homes before you leave for work? Do you lock up your car in the parking lots when shopping?
Do you keep your precious items in a safe? If so then WHY?
@Ben Had: Typical liberal logic; If you disagree with my opinion you are either a mental case or racist.
Democide in the 20th century....look it up.posted @ Monday, January 21, 2013 - 11:38
Let a man never stir on his road a step
without his weapons of war;
for unsure is the knowing when need shall arise
of a spear on the way without.
Heed the words of the ancestors, I know I do.
One should never journey out unarmed, for one never knows what dangers the day may bring.
Sorry but Inalienable right trumps "regulated " every time.
The Constitution is for regulating government powers, Not the peoples freedoms.
@broomsedge: History dictates otherwise, gun regulations lead to gun confiscations lead to democide.
Ask the a Native American how surrendering thier guns worked out for them,
Govt sure to care of them...almost to extinction.
So all you gun-grabber-nut-cases can just suck it up.
Inalienable right: look it up..... My gun rights are not up for discussion...ever..by you or anyone else..ever...period
@E.J.: "I'm sick of this extremist talk!"...LOL can't handle anothers point of view...resort to calling them "extreme"
[in-eyl-yuh-nuh-buh l, -ey-lee-uh-] Show IPA
not alienable; not transferable to another or capable of being repudiated: inalienable rights.
Shall not be infringed upon.
Get used to it and get over it
Summary: I'm not saying it's lonely to be a movie critic, but we often find ourselves seated alone in an empty theatre when we're watching new stuff. I know people who say they won't go see anything unless they have at least one other person to go with, but I've always enjoyed having the place to myself. I'm not saying it's lonely to be a movie critic, but we often find ourselves seated alone in an empty theatre when we're watching new stuff. I know people who say they won't go see anything unless they have at least one other person to go with, but I've always enjoyed having the place to myself. read more