not the brightest recruit tho. needs to look up the word commitment.posted @ Tuesday, January 20, 2015 - 17:41
Have to give credit to someone who has a full time job, serves in the state house, has a family and still manages to finish his schooling. not easily done.posted @ Monday, December 22, 2014 - 07:40
" the check bounced and the bank wants its money back."
This has to be an incorrect statement. A bank will take a check and give cash before it clears?? Only if you had enough cash in your account to cover it, right?
If true, then not only are the people scammed a few fries light of the happy meal, but the banks are holding only the empty bag. Which bank? Hope to heaven its not the one i use.posted @ Thursday, June 12, 2014 - 22:51
I just feel fortunate that Georgia is in such good economic shape that it can afford to pay for both the republican and democratic primaries, even with runoffs. It would be cruel and unfair if the parties had to pay their own way in picking who they choose to run for office (total sarcasm here)
in reality, although the taxpayers pay for the primaries, the parties themselves get to set the rules (like loyalty oaths for republicans etc) and for presidential primaries the national parties can void the primary if the date it is held does not suit them.
Can the banner heralds research team tell the cost to taxpayers for the primaries?posted @ Friday, May 2, 2014 - 06:38
"The campus was put on lockdown while police searched for him."
I think the use of the word "lockdown" is interesting. Merriam-Webster defines lockdown
" - the confinement of prisoners to their cells for all or most of the day as a temporary security measure."
i guess that is how the government sees us, as prisoners?posted @ Friday, April 25, 2014 - 20:10
By the way, does anyone know what it cost the state in the last presidential primary to help the democrats decide who their candidate would be? that one was hard to guess. excellent use of taxpayer money that one governor,posted @ Wednesday, January 22, 2014 - 19:12
"best move for voters' time and taxpayers' money."
The best move for the taxpayers would be to have the two parties pay for their own candidate selection process. No one is elected to office in these primaries, each party not the state controls the majority of rules. for example you are required to take an oath “I do hereby swear or affirm my allegiance to the Georgia Republican Party.” to appear on the republican primary ballot. how about allegiance to all the people of the state of Georgia?
If a state holds its primary not in accordance with the national party's wishes the state can lose its delegates to the party's national convention, making the taxpayer paid for primary meaningless. (see florida in 2008).
These primaries are nothing but the taxpayers paying for a media event to promote the two major parties.
Lets have true "free and fair" elections and have ALL candidates have to follow the same requirements to appear on the ballot, all candidates having to have 51,000 registered voter signatures to appear on the ballot for governor for example, not just independents and third party candidates.
These primaries are nothing but REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS using state funds to make sure only REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS get elected.posted @ Wednesday, January 22, 2014 - 19:00
I know you folks work full days all ready so with "guide to the week, a crime and public safety section, a revamped events page, a new outdoors page, regular special sections, more investigative work, a weekly kids page, travel pages and moree kids page, more " how many new hires are expected? glad you are creating more jobs.
good idea in theory, the devil is in the details.
"licensing safeguards aren’t necessary for the people getting mortgages from nonprofits, he said, because the interest rates are so low"
So have a cap of 1% on the interest rate?posted @ Saturday, January 18, 2014 - 07:32
@Jim Thompson: Jim, your statement does have some validity but is on the wrong track i believe, i too admire people who sign their names to their comments, and feel personal attacks are a waste of type.
But increasingly most issues sink to personal attacks on who said them, not on what is said.
Not picking on you personally Jim, but have you ever considered what the ABH does to the level of comments when "points" are rewarded not for the value of what is said but for the volume?posted @ Friday, December 6, 2013 - 17:17
Again and again with the "its the republicans" or the "its the democrats" craptrap. Its the democrats AND republicans!!!
one of the major claimed causes of the financial crisis was the repeal of Glass-Steagall, lead by pres. B. Clinton (a dem). it boosted gains in the short term (making the economy rise during the Clinton admin.) before crashing.
So it is not just the republicans. or just the democrats, it is both of them.posted @ Friday, December 6, 2013 - 07:35
As long as they can keep the discussion about which is worse, the democrats or the republicans, we will continue to decline. the problem is the DEMOCRATS AND THE REPUBLICANS,posted @ Thursday, December 5, 2013 - 07:56
"unified government will hire a consultant"?? and this will cost???posted @ Wednesday, December 4, 2013 - 07:26
if you are considered innocent until proven guilty, and you have no problem taking DNA samples from people only arrested(i.e. still innocent at that point), why not take DNA samples from the most innocent of all, new born babies? take DNA with filing a birth certificate?
where to draw the line on government is always a tough question. think what surveillance cameras in every home would do to reduce domestic violence. breathalyser controlled ignition on every car could almost eliminate drunk driving.
innocent men and women should be free until proven guilty. and freedom includes privacy.posted @ Tuesday, November 12, 2013 - 07:05
As much as I am opposed to taxes, taxing political donations might be a good idea.
placing limits on how much a citizen can donate does infringe on his right to free speech,the answer is to limit how much a candidate can accept. candidates for office have no constitutional right to unlimited funds. but none of the elected hacks would ever put the people's and country's interests above their own.posted @ Monday, October 14, 2013 - 05:05
Assad has tanks, fighter jets and an army against rebels with limited arms.
The world has basically agreed to stay out of the conflict, UNLESS he uses chemical weapons.
So he is going to go ahead and use chemical weapons and bring the U.S. into the conflict??
more likely the rebels used chemicals to bring the US into the fight.
also consider that Raytheon stock is up about 50% from its year low now that action is threatened. Raytheon makes the tomahawk missile.
if Assad is overthrown who steps into power in Syria? Al-Quida is among Assad's opposition,
a strong national defense is essential for America, but Assad and the Syrian government present no threat the United States, but an excellent opportunity for the military industrial complex.posted @ Tuesday, September 3, 2013 - 05:15
the U.S. started sending more F-16 fighter planes to Egypt as a gift (yes taxpayer funded) just 6 months ago. And now Egypt experiences a military coup. who could have seen that coming?
Got to love those geniuses in Washington. adding deficit to the american budget, increasing instability in the middle east, but making Lockhead Martin money.posted @ Wednesday, July 3, 2013 - 15:09
"who “struggles for freedom of information,"it’s hard not to gag. Any Russian who did similarly would wind up in the gulag or worse."
I agree with that statement. the question is what separates our country's actions from Russians? Would the US lock someone who released classified info naked in a cell for 24 hours a day and keep him in isolation?
There is a real need for government secrecy at times. Troop positions, military technology and other things need to remain classified. But the right of the citizens to know what a government is doing also needs protection. A free man is not constantly monitored.posted @ Sunday, June 30, 2013 - 05:31
it appears this legislation defines the point of sale as where the consumer is rather than where the business is located. seems backassward to me.
sales tax help pay for the fire/police/roads etc that primarily are provided for the business, what with the road leading from the store, the fire department protecting the inventory, etc. , so the amount of the sales tax should be what the sales tax is where the business is located. (property taxes provide for the protection of the things i own).
it may be different for vehicles, but if I drive to SC to buy a tv I pay SC sales tax. when i order over the phone i pay tax according to where it is from, not where i placed the call.
taxing according to where the business is located would serve to keep taxes in check to avoid business from relocating, as well as make collecting easier as it would all be instate. allowing california to have any control whatsoever on a business located in GA simply because the purchaser is a resident of CA seems out of line.posted @ Tuesday, May 7, 2013 - 02:37
And save even more, get rid of the Seaport subsidized flights. That is $1.5 million a year, surely close to the cost of 6 air traffic controllers?posted @ Saturday, February 23, 2013 - 06:59
“There are people in that district that are antsy because they are unsure about their property,” said Commissioner George Maxwell.
It is "their" property for the "county" to decide what can be done with it.posted @ Friday, January 18, 2013 - 05:23
I was worried what would happen if the government runs out of money- who would be paid? Soldiers would not, most government employees would not, government contractors would not.
But fortunately congressmen and senators and the president would, due to their interpretation of the 27th amendment.
see http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/04/why-soldiers-wont-paid-o... among many others.posted @ Monday, January 14, 2013 - 08:00
"Obama’s inaugural planners have put an emphasis on reflecting diversity in the festivities"
someone needs a dictionary when they think diversity means all people thinking politically correct.posted @ Friday, January 11, 2013 - 06:09
The second amendment has nothing to do with hunting.
consider what a democrat had to say about it:
"Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of citizens to keep and bear arms. This is not to say that firearms should not be very carefully used, and that definite safety rules of precaution should not be taught and enforced. But the right of citizens to bear arms is just one more guarantee against arbitrary government, and one more safeguard against a tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible."
-- Hubert Humphrey, "Know Your Lawmakers" - Guns Magazine - Feb 1960
"There's no country on Earth that would tolerate missiles raining down on its citizens from outside its borders," said Barack Obama right before authorizing drone strikes in Pakistan and Yemenposted @ Tuesday, November 20, 2012 - 06:56
Summary: I'm not saying it's lonely to be a movie critic, but we often find ourselves seated alone in an empty theatre when we're watching new stuff. I know people who say they won't go see anything unless they have at least one other person to go with, but I've always enjoyed having the place to myself. I'm not saying it's lonely to be a movie critic, but we often find ourselves seated alone in an empty theatre when we're watching new stuff. I know people who say they won't go see anything unless they have at least one other person to go with, but I've always enjoyed having the place to myself. read more
As you might imagine, the vast majority of the editorial cartoons available these days for publication through the syndicate which supplies cartoons to the Athens Banner-Herald/OnlineAthens are addressing the situation in Ferguson, Mo., where the fatal shooting of a black teen by a white police officer has touched off a number of demonstrations -- some peaceful, but many not at all peaceful, with tear gas fired by police officers and gunshots fired by some protester. read more