@As I See It: Who says I dont fight for the starving children? Who says I don't contribute financially, prayerfully, and with my time toward these causes? In fact I do, but that's not the issue. I think all children, no matter what their circumstances are worth fighting for which is more than I can say for pro-choice advocates who choose to murder an innocent life. So let the air out of your windbag and get to work for a real cause instead of trying to silence those who are trying to make a difference. It would do you some good.

The pro-choice movement crowd would do well to educate themselves on Margaret Sanger but then again that would require them to actually learn something pertinent to the issue. 57 million innocent children killed in the process of giving women a choice. A choice to do what? A choice to murder their unborn baby. Absolutely sickening!

@savoir-faire: If you don't consider an under the table 333% raise requested by Weeks not to be a shady deal, then I can't help you any further. I'm not going to spell this stuff out for you. Like I said, stay informed.

@savoir-faire: apparently you haven't stayed informed the last 4 or 5 years...

@savoir-faire: http://www.peachpundit.com/2009/03/13/reality-check-for-the-oconee-schoo...

and leave my nads out of this...

I don't know whose worse....Weeks or Guest.

Smart move Weeks....he knows he'd get beat anyways considering all the shady deals he's done in the past while serving as Chairman.

One more time... Hillary Rosen, serving as advisor to the President, logged more White House visits than a majority of Cabinet members. Thanks for her biography but that fact alone tells me what I need to know. Although it doesn't seem like you can read between the lines though....

And by the way, Rosen didn't include "for a paycheck" in her comments and you know that. Good luck if you want the administration to use that as their justification too...

@fightback2: Considering Rosen has been to the White House more times than most cabinet members I'd be careful with that statement. Once again, educate yourself with the facts. Maybe if I repeat myself enough you'll finally get it...although I have my doubts

@fightback2: I'm pretty sure it was your candidate that referred to it as a "luxury" to stay at home with children not to mention his big buddy Hillary Rosen and her words of venom. Why don't you educate yourself before spewing nonsense...

@fightback2: Considering the Obama campaign's war on stay at home mom's, I guess that means you'll be voting for Romney.... that's surprising since I had you pegged a liberal but my mistake....welcome aboard!

@fightback2: Apparently you've never experienced the joy of volunteering at the Special Olympics and witnessed first hand how "real" and loving these children are

Since I'm not gay, I don't want to be a hypocrite. Let me guess you're not gay, but have an opinion. Not surprised at all....

@ugakat2003: unless you personally were aborted by your mother and can attest that her decision worked out in your favor then its probably best you find another topic to be so passionate about... at the very least learn the definition of a hypocrite

@ ugakat2003: typical response.... I would assume you never been aborted. If so, we can continue this discussion. Otherwise, it seems a little hypocritical on your part....

@ugakat2003 and I guess we don't have a plethora of couples hoping to adopt, do we?

@ ugakat2003 would you propose legislation for the euthanization of orphans?

You sick people would rather protect a woman's so-called right to kill her child than protect the child itself. Amazing....absolutely amazing...I guess its a good thing your mom didn't choose to abort you, huh?

@poro now THAT is funny....

@ Oh-brother, clearly the only joke here is your man in the white house now. Everything he has done has been a joke, but no one is laughing...

@DanMatthews: No need for you as the grammar police here. Why don't you get back to working on your campaign? Oh that's right...you lost!

Wait, isn't Dan Matthews the same guy that made fun of the hearing impaired (Bob Smith) and followed it up with this comment...

"I am not ashamed or apologizing for trying to inject a little humor into an otherwise boring local political landscape."

Yeah, that's EXACTLY who I want representing me....are you kidding me?!?!

It's amazing how much hot air is blown on these comment pages. Not a single one of you would have a clue what it takes to do either job so why don't you stick to something you do know a lot about like twittering or something like that....